Every strategy deck should have one uncomfortable slide
- gabsmorelli

- Sep 29
- 1 min read
Every strategy deck should have one uncomfortable slide:
đ Whatâs our Achilles heel?
Not the usual clichĂŠs⌠âmargin pressureâ or âcompetition.â
I mean the existential risks:
⢠What event could take us out of the game long enough that we never recover?
⢠Where are we dangerously over-reliant? One product, one site, one client, one market?
Pharma has brutal reminders:
⢠Ranbaxy (2013â2014): FDA bans crippled its U.S. business. Within a year, it was acquired by Sun Pharma. Achilles heel: regulatory trust.
⢠Actavis (2000sâ2012): Overextended with acquisitions and debt until Watson swallowed it. Achilles heel: over-leverage.
⢠Schering-Plough (2009): Narrow portfolio and looming cliffs forced a merger with Merck. Achilles heel: concentration risk.
⢠Pharmacia (early 2000s): Integration failures and pipeline weakness led to Pfizer acquisition. Achilles heel: pipeline fragility.
⢠Genentech (2009): Reliance on blockbusters and Rocheâs structure meant full takeover. Achilles heel: ownership vulnerability.
⢠Celgene (2019): Dependence on Revlimid made it a target for BMS. Achilles heel: single-product reliance.
As Taleb reminds us in Antifragile, black swans donât send calendar invites. You canât predict which heel gets hit, but you can design resilience:
⢠Diversification- beyond one molecule, market, or client.
⢠Redundancy- back-up sites, suppliers, leadership.
⢠Optionality- the freedom to pivot when markets or regulators shift.
Fragile companies play âwhat if.â
Anti-fragile companies play âeven if.â
The hardest boardroom question is also the most liberating one:
đ Even if our Achilles heel gets hit, do we survive, adapt, and come out stronger?
đ Follow for insightsÂ
âťď¸ Share if you find it interesting



Comments